If you're an author trying to decide how to publish, you're allowed to throw that hat on the ground and stomp on it. I know. It's frustrating. I've self-published and traditionally published, and years and years ago, I once vanity published (trying to forget that experience).
No one way is right for all, but you have definite issues to consider with each one. You just have to weigh the good, the bad, and what fits in your life, your marketing plan, and your pocketbook.
Traditional
- Pays royalties based upon sales
- You pay nothing
- Highly vetted
- What you generally see on bookstore shelves
- The publisher is responsible for formatting, cover, editing, distribution
- You sign away an agreed upon number of rights
- Found at Amazon and B&N and in Indie bookstores.
- ISBN belongs to traditional press
- You pay everything
- You own all rights
- You receive all money
- You are the publisher, responsible for formatting, cover, editing, distribution
- You are the distributor
- Some difficulty placing books in brick and mortar stores
- Found at Amazon and B&N online and e-book venues like Smashwords
- Common method used for e-book sales
- Indie means an author creates the image of an imprint or "publishing house" for his/her books
- ISBN belongs to you/your imprint
- You pay part of the cost
- You negotiate the rights, but are usually able to keep more, if not all, rights
- You receive royalties, usually at a higher rate than traditional
- You choose the degree of editing, formatting, cover, and pay for the service
- Your investment determines the print run, just like self-publishing
- Sometimes material is vetted, depending on the entity
- ISBN belongs to hybrid press, but might be negotiated.
- You pay everything
- You own all rights
- You receive royalties at a much higher rate than traditional
- You agree to formatting, cover, editing, distribution, marketing in the price
- Agreements may be made to restrict rights of author and increase rights of press to harbor the book in its catalog
- Minimal vetting; some do not vet at all
- ISBN belongs to press
2 comments:
I thought Indie Publishing was more like Traditional than Self, in that it pretty much is traditional publishing but with an independent publishe, rather than a large brand, who will devote more attention to your book but have less contacts and therefore will produce and sell less copies. Am I thinking of something else? Or have I just got this wrong?
Louise
What's happened, IMHO, is that what used to be very small publishing companies that were traditional hs morphed into individals who have started small publishing companies to hide the fact they are self-publishing. So you'll see this term used on either side of the line. In either case, study them closely.
Post a Comment